Skip to content
APPLICATION ANSWERS · E-2 FIELD GUIDE

Does a well-known franchise make E-2 approval easier to assume?

Sources checked:

THE DIRECT ANSWER

No brand makes the applicant automatically eligible. The assessment still concerns the particular investor, commitment, rights and operating enterprise.

Ask about this agreement and this operator

Identify the actual owner and the role the applicant plans to perform. Provide the governing documents instead of relying on another franchisee's reported result. Two businesses using the same brand can involve different funding, control and personal circumstances.

Hypothetical example: A Canadian citizen plans to buy a mobile bicycle-repair kiosk and operate it at several U.S. office parks. The first review produces an ownership chart, a contract list, a cash-flow model, and a role description explaining who decides prices, suppliers, and daily operations. The purchase agreement and operating agreement settle control; invoices, escrow terms, and account records settle which funds are committed; the business plan and staffing assumptions address whether the venture is more than a personal living. Start with treaty nationality and ownership, then trace the funds, then test the operating plan. Trouble appears when an investor calls a deposit an investment even though it can be withdrawn freely, or submits projections without a credible plan to create capacity beyond the household. The investment must be committed and exposed to risk in a real, non-marginal enterprise that the investor will develop and direct. Keep this E2 requirements record aligned with final filing facts and issued source materials, then preserve a dated copy internally before formal submission for future reference and review by responsible staff if questions arise later.